Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Radios Used in a Contest Environment
  • Rob Sherwood
  • NCØB
2
Why Did I Start Testing Radios ?
  • K8RRH & I purchased new Drake R-4Cs in the late 70s
  • Used them during the ARRL 160m CW contest
  • Radios performed miserably yet Specs Were Good
  • 70s: League expanded testing to include Noise Floor & Dynamic Range, new concepts for the amateur.
  • R-4C tested well for Dynamic Range, but flunked CW contest 101
  • Was the wrong thing being tested or did the test not approximate a real amateur environment, especially
    a CW contest environment?
3
Why Did I Start Testing Radios (page 2)?
  • 20 kHz Dynamic Range test showed that in a multi-conversion radio it was only testing the radio’s front end
  • If the first IF was 6 - 20 kHz wide, be it at 5 MHz, 9 MHz
    or 45 - 70 MHz, the radio would overload in a pile up.
  • 20 kHz test showed no hint of the problem
  • Solution: Place test signals close together so they pass through 1st IF Filter " the Next Amplifier " Mixer
  • Close-in dynamic range numbers were ALWAYS drastically worse than the wide-spaced numbers & correctly approximated a CW pileup
4
What 2 Numbers are Most Important for a Contester? (Especially CW Contester)
  • Noise Floor
  • Close-in Dynamic Range
5
What is Noise Floor?
  • Sensitivity is a familiar number, normally applies to SSB.
  • Sensitivity = 10 dB Signal + Noise / Noise (10 dB S+N/N)
  • Noise Floor = 3 dB Signal + Noise / Noise  (3 dB S+N/N)


  • Noise floor can be measured at any filter bandwidth, CW or SSB, for example


  • League normally only publishes noise floor for a CW bandwidth, typically 500 Hz CW filter
6
What is Dynamic Range?
  • What is the Close-in Dynamic Range vs Wide-Spaced Dynamic Range published in QST?
  • (Note: recent expanded League receiver tests include close-in Dynamic Range, somewhat buried in a graph)
  • Why is Close-in Dynamic so important?
7
Dynamic Range Data
8
Third Order IMD
9
Switch to a Narrow Roofing Filter
10
Dynamic Range Data
11
Wide & Close Dynamic Range
12
Dynamic Range Data
13
Icom 756 Pro
14
When are 2 Out of Pass Band Signals a Problem?
15
New in 2003 - 2004: Orion & IC-7800
  • Ten-Tec Orion & Icom IC-7800
  • Until the Orion came out, 99% of modern transceivers were up conversion radios.    (K2 the exception)
  • If the first IF is above 10 meters (30 MHz), can you switch in a narrow CW roofing filter?  No
  • The fractional bandwidth of a 600 Hz CW filter at 5 MHz is the same as a 6 kHz filter at 50 MHz.
  • Thus most up conversion radios have a first IF at least 6 kHz wide & often as wide as 15 kHz.
16
New in 2003: Orion
  • 20 kHz for FM
  • 6 kHz for AM or wide Hi Fi SSB
  • 2.4 kHz for most SSB operation
  • 1.0 kHz for most CW operation
  • One can add optional roofing filters of 1.8 kHz,
    500 Hz & 250 Hz bandwidths
17
New in 2003 : Orion
  • Roofing Filters track DSP Bandwidth Setting
  • Dynamic range of the Orion with various Roofing Filters (Refer to Rig Table)
  • Discuss Proposed Changes to Orion Design
  • Bank of 7 Filters. Ignore Insertion Loss
  • The Orion offers lots of features, but some quirks that some operators may find objectionable
  • This discussion revolves around close-in dynamic range only & the Orion’s absolutely excellent final DSP filtering down to as narrow as 150 Hz bandwidth
18
Dynamic Range Data
19
New in 2004: IC-7800
  • The often-quoted specification of a third order intercept (IP3) in excess of +40 dBm is intriguing.
  • Few Published Specifications, other than IP3
  • I have not tested the 7800
  • All data from the League
  • Wide-spaced data < Measurements from Icom Factory
20
New in 2004: IC-7800
  • Phase noise & IMD have similar magnitude at 1 & 2 kHz spacing.
  • Dynamic Range > Wide-Spacing due to Tracking Preselector
  • One would expect a dynamic range closer to 110 dB with an IP3 greater than +40 dBm.
21
What Will The Future Bring?
  • Narrow Roofing Filters concept proved effective in late 70s with a niche after market product. It has finally been incorporated into a modern solid-state transceiver.
  • The unknown question is whether the over all experience provided by the Orion will grab enough market share to awaken the Japanese OEMs to offer this level performance.
  • Orion offers 10 - 15 dB improvement & in many cases up to 20 – 30 dB in handling close-in strong undesired signals, compared to others.
22
Transmitted Bandwidth Problems
  • Need Improvement
  • ALC induced splatter on SSB
    • Solid State Linear
  • Key clicks on CW
    • ALC / Processor Affecting Rise & Fall Time
23
Conclusion
  • Contester needs best receiver possible, especially for CW operation
  • Ten-Tec Orion design is a step in a new direction. It has taken over 25 years for my concept of using roofing filters with a bandwidth similar to the final selectivity to be incorporated into an OEM rig.
  • 25 years of up conversion radios have generally offered a 20 kHz dynamic range in the 90s but a 2 kHz close-in dynamic range in the 70s. Typical degradation of dynamic range within the up conversion filter bandwidth is 25 dB.
24
Conclusion (page 2)
  • The key question has been whether it would be possible to design an up conversion radio with the capability to maintain most of the dynamic range provided by the front end (first mixer). Preliminary numbers on the 7800 continue to show the normal degradation inside the first IF roofing filter of more than 20 dB.
  • If, however, one could produce a 20 kHz dynamic range of 110 dB and a 2 kHz dynamic range of 90 dB, this would be adequate in most cases.  So far this “dream” has been elusive.
25
Sherwood Engineering